Do you want to review the security of the pollinations/pollinations project, or just find out what’s in that security folder? I can help either way. Here are a few ways we can proceed, plus a starter security review you can use right away.

What I can help with
- If you provide the contents of the security-related files (e.g., SECURITY.md, security folder, CODEOWNERS), I can summarize and point out risks and improvements.
- If you want a security review plan, I can give you a structured checklist tailored to a modern OSS project (dependencies, secrets, data, CI/CD, supply chain, etc.).
- If you want practical steps to audit the repo locally, I can suggest commands and processes to run.

Quick-start security review plan (five steps)
1) Policy and disclosure
- Look for a SECURITY.md or a security disclosure policy.
- Ensure there is a clear process for reporting vulnerabilities (contact method, responsible disclosure timeline, escalation path).
- Confirm there is a defined security response coordination (who triages, who fixes, how updates are communicated).

2) Secrets and exposure
- Scan the repo for secrets, keys, or credentials (e.g., tokens, AWS keys, database passwords). Use grep-like checks: search for words like password, secret, token, key, decrypt, etc.
- Check that secrets aren’t committed; ensure there are no long-lived credentials in the history.
- Verify that CI/CD and environment files use encrypted secrets and do not embed credentials in code or configs.

3) Dependencies and build integrity
- Review how dependencies are managed (package managers, lockfiles, pinned versions).
- Check for known-vulnerability scanning in CI (npm audit, npm audit fix, pip-audit, cargo-audit, bundler-aix, etc.).
- Ensure we have SBOMs or other visibility into third-party components.

4) Data handling and privacy
- Identify what user data is collected, stored, or transmitted.
- Review data minimization, retention, and access controls.
- Check for configurable privacy options and clear terms about prompt data and generated content.

5) Build, runtime, and supply chain
- Examine containerization (Dockerfiles) or VM images for least-privilege configurations, non-root execution, and up-to-date base images.
- Look for hard-coded paths, secrets, or misconfigurations in deployment manifests, Helm charts, or Kubernetes configs.
- Ensure reproducible builds and integrity checks (e.g., checksums, verification steps).

Key artifacts to inspect
- SECURITY.md, SECURITY_POLICY, or security section in README
- CODEOWNERS and .github/workflows (for security escalation and review)
- Dockerfiles, Kubernetes manifests, and deployment configs
- Dependency manifests and lockfiles (package.json, requirements.txt, poetry.lock, go.sum, etc.)
- Any secrets-management config (env.example files, vault integration docs)
- Logging and observability docs (make sure no secrets are logged)

Common risk areas to look at
- Credential leakage in code history or config files
- Insecure defaults (auth is off by default, wide-open CORS, weak auth)
- Inadequate access controls on APIs (rate limits, auth scopes, token expiry)
- Prompt or data leakage through prompts or generated content
- Supply chain risks (dependencies with known vulns, unpinned versions)
- Insecure CI/CD (secret keys in workflows, unverified actions)

If you want, I can tailor a review checklist to pollinations/pollinations specifically (e.g., what tech stack it uses, typical deployment model) once you share a bit more context or the contents of the security-related files.

Would you like me to:
- Walk through a concrete security checklist for this repo, or
- Help interpret specific files you have from security folder, or
- Help draft or improve a SECURITY.md for the project?